logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2017.02.03 2016고단3428
청소년보호법위반
Text

The defendant shall be innocent.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is the business owner of the “Eel” located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju (hereinafter “the instant telecom”).

No person engaged in lodging business shall be allowed to engage in any business disturbing public morals, such as permitting juveniles to sleep in a sexual intercourse, or provide a place for such business purpose.

Nevertheless, on May 14, 2016 19:0- 21:00, the Defendant, at the above 203 heading room of the 203 heading room, engaged in business activities that disturb public morals, such as making juveniles f (17 years of age, female), and G (30 years of age, male, and female) congested.

2. Determination

A. In a case where there are circumstances to suspect that a person engaged in a female business is a juvenile on the outer features, habitss, or scams, etc. of those who intend to be sexually married, the person should be allowed to be sexually married only if it is confirmed by identification card or any other reliable method that the juvenile is not a juvenile and only if it is confirmed that the juvenile is not a juvenile. In a case where the person allowed to be sexually divorced without confirmation as above, at least the juvenile had dolusent intention on

In light of the above legal principles, in order for the Defendant, who operates the instant telecom, to have dolusent intent about the instant telecom, the Defendant ought to be aware of the fact that a specific person who is likely to be suspected as a juvenile from the instant telecom, intends to have sexual intercourse, or is able to have sexual intercourse. In light of the aforementioned legal principles, the Defendant ought to be aware that a specific person who is able to be suspected as a juvenile from the instant telecom, intends to have sexual intercourse, or is able to have sexual intercourse.

B. In full view of the following facts and circumstances admitted as recorded in the record, the evidence produced by the prosecutor alone by the evidence submitted by the prosecutor that the Defendant recognized the fact that the Defendant, a juvenile, was able to have a sexual intercourse, or that the Defendant did not have any doubt about the fact that the Defendant was able to have a sexual intercourse, or that the Defendant was able to have been aware of the fact that the Defendant was able

It is difficult to see and otherwise recognize it.

arrow