logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대법원 2017. 07. 11. 선고 2017두39112 판결
(심리불속행) 국외근로자라고 하더라도 국내 거주자에 해당함[국승]
Case Number of the immediately preceding lawsuit

Seoul High Court-2016-Nu-6349 ( February 22, 2017)

Title

(ps) If an overseas employee is a foreign employee, the employee shall be a domestic resident.

Summary

(C) In light of the above legal principles, it is reasonable to view that the Plaintiff constitutes a resident under the former Income Tax Act in 2011, taking into account the following circumstances: (a) the Plaintiff’s status as a resident under the former Income Tax Act in 2011, which is the taxable

Related statutes

Article 2 of the Enforcement Decree of the Income Tax Act and Determination of Residence

Cases

2017du39112 global income and revocation of disposition

Plaintiff-Appellant

박〇〇

Defendant-Appellee

〇〇세무서장

Judgment of the lower court

Seoul High Court Decision 2016Nu63349 Decided February 22, 2017

Imposition of Judgment

July 11, 2017

Text

The appeal is dismissed.

The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiff.

Reasons

All of the records of this case and the judgment of the court below and the grounds of appeal were examined, but it is clear that the allegation in the grounds of appeal by appellant constitutes Article 4 of the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Procedure of Appeal and therefore, the appeal is dismissed pursuant to Article 5 of the above Act. It is so decided as per Disposition by

arrow