beta
Text
1. The Plaintiff:
A. Defendant A’s KRW 13,113,197 as well as 5% per annum from August 4, 2015 to June 22, 2017.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. The Plaintiff is an insurer who registered the Nonparty B as the named insured and entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract containing a special agreement for the injury by an non-insurance vehicle (hereinafter referred to as “non-insurance vehicle”) with respect to the vehicle C (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff”), and the Defendant A is the driver of the D vehicle (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant vehicle”), and the Defendant Hyundai Marine Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Defendant insurance company”) is the insurer who entered into a liability insurance contract with respect to the Defendant vehicle.
B. Around 03:02 on May 12, 2013, Defendant A: (a) driven the Defendant’s vehicle at the parking lot located in the Yacheon-dong, Yacheon-dong, Yacheon-dong, Yacheon-dong, Yacheon-dong, Yacheon-do; and (b) there was a conflict between the right side of the Plaintiff’s vehicle, which was parked at the same place, and then the latter part of the vehicle, to the next
(2) At the time, the Plaintiff’s vehicle was the driver B and the passenger E. (2) B, and E, after each of the above accidents, received from each of the F oriental medical hospitals the diagnosis of 3 weeks of catum, tensions, salute base and tensions, etc., and received hospital treatment at the same time, and thereafter received hospital treatment at multiple hospitals including the above hospital.
3) The Plaintiff requested the medical examination of E to the Lee Ho-dong Hospital Ma, and the medical specialist above was diagnosed on June 9, 2014 as follows: ① there was a conical signboard escape certificate between 30% and 3-4% of the degree of contribution to the instant accident to B on May 20, 2013 on the ground of Radical MRI taken on May 20, 2013; ② it is anticipated that 6.9% of the labor ability will be reduced for two years; ② MRI taken on July 25, 2013, taken on March 11, 2014 on the ground of MademI taken on March 11, 2014, based on the contribution ratio of 30% to E on August 12, 2014, the Plaintiff was expected to have paid the insurance money of this case to E for 19% of the insurance money of this case for 19% for 2 years.