1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the Defendants KRW 7,706,710 against each Plaintiff A and the Defendants from September 6, 2014 to June 2018.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is as follows, except for the following parts that are either changed or added, and thus, it is also cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

2. Of the judgment of the first instance in the occurrence of the liability for damages, the third part of the judgment of the court of first instance, ① the phrase “the next map” to the word “the second line” to the word “the fourth lines” to be deleted, and ② the following judgments shall be added at the end of the fifth lines.

“The Plaintiff (the Plaintiff is the Defendant C’s responsibility that the instant accident was committed entirely by driving the bicycle, and there was no negligence against the Plaintiffs, but it appears that the instant accident would not have occurred if the Plaintiffs did not cross the bicycle at night, and it is difficult to deem that the Plaintiffs do not have any responsibility for the instant accident).”

3. Scope of liability for damages

A. From the fourth and fifth lines of the judgment of the first instance, ① deemed to have lost 100% of the labor ability (which shall be deemed to have lost 60% of the labor ability) shall be deemed to have lost 40% of the labor ability, and the following judgments shall be added; ② “each share 2” of the fifth lines shall be deleted; ③ “19,430,598 won (=22,859,528 won x 85%) of the third lines shall be deemed to have been “7,72,239 won (=22,859,528 won x 40% x 85%)” and the third lines shall be deemed to have been “7,72,239 won (i.e., 22,859,528 won x 40% x 85% of the labor ability).”

While Plaintiff A asserts that “the labor disability rate during the period of his own hospitalization should be 100%,” the Defendants asserted that “the labor disability rate during his admission period should be considered in calculating the labor disability rate during his admission period.”

If the king of the victim of the accident has contributed to the occurrence of a specific injury to the victim as a result of the aggravation of the specific injury or the prolonged period of treatment, or the expansion of the degree of disability after the completion of treatment, the result of the whole injury including the specific injury.