Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. On July 11, 2013, at around 18:35, the Defendant was driving a Brocketing motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol concentration of approximately 0.239% from the 2km section of approximately 2km to the national highways of approximately 59, the Defendant was under the influence of alcohol concentration of approximately 0.239% from the 18:40 on July 11, 2013, at the restaurant of the Ginyeong-do’s house located in the Haak-gun Eup of the Gangwon-gun Jongwon-gun, Gangwon-gun-gun.
2. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (Death or Injury caused by Dangerous Driving) is a person engaged in driving B rocketing motor vehicles;
At around 18:40 on July 11, 2013, the Defendant driven the said motor vehicle under the influence of alcohol from the national highways No. 59, which was located in the Socuk branch in the Socon Eup of Gangwon-gun, and led to the flow of the said motor vehicle at a speed of unsured one-lane road from the surface of the land in the area of the land in the area of the land in which the motor vehicle was under the influence of alcohol, as provided in paragraph 1.
At that time, there was a duty of care to look at the front left and to proceed in a safe speed and manner by maintaining the car lines, since the low-water surface is a place where the center line of the yellow-line is installed, and thus, the driver was obliged to perform the duty of care.
Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to drive normally due to such influence of alcohol as above, and caused the negligence of driving the central line while driving it, and caused the negligence of the Defendant, which led to the failure of the victim C (the age of 29) who was driving on the surface of a car in the front of the right edge of the damaged vehicle, to avoid driving the D-ro car operated by the victim C (the age of 29) who was driving in the front of the right edge of the damaged vehicle.
Ultimately, the Defendant, by negligence in the above occupational negligence, inflicted an injury on the injured party C, such as climatic salt in need of approximately two weeks of treatment, and inflicted an injury on the injured party E (the 29-year old-age-old-age-age-age-age-age-age-based climatic salt in need of approximately two weeks of treatment on the injured party E (the 29-year-old-age-old-age-age-