logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 춘천지방법원 영월지원 2013.12.17 2013고단460
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Around 17:30 on July 21, 2013, the Defendant driven C Poter truck under the influence of alcohol of approximately 0.059% alcohol level from the 64-lane 17:5 meters away from the sloping-gun, Gangwon-do, Chungcheongnam-do to the Gun roads located in the Gun roads (a 1km away from the sloping-do, the sloping-do, to the sloping-do, the sloping-do, and the sloping-do (the sloping-do, the sloping-do, the sloping-do).

2. The defendant in violation of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and the Road Traffic Act is a person engaged in the driving of CPoter cargo vehicles.

On July 21, 2013, at around 17:30, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle in the state of alcohol as set forth in paragraph (1) of the above paragraph in the Gun road located in the Gun where it is located in the Gun where it is located in Gangwon-gun, Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongnam-do, and led to the flow of the road one way in one way in one way in one way in one way as the eth of the ethb

At the same time, the road is bended by a narrow channel, and there was a e-mail vehicle driven by the victim D (the age of 22) in the opposite part, and thus, the person engaged in driving service has a duty of care to look well at the e-mail and to proceed with it at a safe speed and method.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not avoid the above damaged vehicle due to the negligence of driving beyond the center part of the road while neglecting it under the influence of alcohol, and the Defendant did not avoid the above damaged vehicle that was going to the shot-do, the shot-do, the shot-do, the upper part of the freight driven by the Defendant, with the upper part above the left-hand part of the said damaged vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant caused the victim D’s damage to the surrounding land and power lines in need of approximately six weeks’ treatment due to occupational negligence, and caused damage to the victim FF (23 years of age) who was accompanied by the damaged vehicle for about three weeks’ treatment, and at the same time, had the damaged vehicle bear approximately KRW 5,337,548 repair costs.

3. A defendant who violates the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act;

arrow