beta
Text
Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a term of one year and three months.
However, the execution of the above punishment for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
[Criminal Power] On April 11, 2017, the Defendant received a summary order of KRW 4 million as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving) from the Youngcheon District Court’s Young-gu branch on April 11, 2017.
【Criminal Facts】
1. The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving service of a vehicle B with low-priced vehicle.
On November 16, 2019, the Defendant driven the said car at around 19:00, and driven the two-lane road in front of the D'D', at the time of Gangwon-do, along one-lane from the 'listed Dong' to the 'high line' side.
At night, since it was difficult for a person engaged in the driving of motor vehicles at night, he/she had a duty of care to prevent accidents by accurately manipulating the steering direction and brakes and accurately.
Nevertheless, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.124%, was driving while neglecting the above duty of care, and the part of the backer part of the victim E (the age of 44) driving, which was parked in the signal air at the bend of the bend, was shocked with the fronter part of the above-mentioned car driven by the Defendant.
Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, by negligence in the above business, the injury to the victim E, such as fluoral salt in need of approximately two weeks of medical treatment, the injury to the fluoral salt in need of medical treatment for about two weeks to the victim G (V, 21 years of age), and the injury to the fluoral salt in need of medical treatment for about two weeks to the victim H (V, 19 years of age) who was on board the damaged vehicle.
2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (driving a sound driving) driving a vehicle B with the 0.124% alcohol concentration at the section of approximately 2 km from the first road of the “D” located in the same city as “D” in the case of the temporary border of Gangwon-do as stated in the above paragraph (1) to the front road of the said city.
Accordingly, the Defendant violated the prohibition of driving under the influence of alcohol not less than twice.
Summary of Evidence
1. The defendant;