1. The Plaintiff’s appeal against Defendant (Appointed Party) B, Appointor F, Defendant C, D, and E is dismissed in entirety.

2...

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation concerning this case is the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the following parts written by the court of first instance. Thus, it shall be accepted by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Supplementary part] The last sentence of the second sentence of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be executed by cutting the “Defendant F”, the “F” of the third and the “F” of the said two and the “F” of the said 13th sentence into “Selection F”.

The phrase "Seoul Metropolitan Government" shall be inserted in the Seoul Special Metropolitan City as "Seoul Metropolitan City," between the third and 10 of the judgment of the first instance.

The "Defendants" in the 3th, 14, 17, and 21 of the judgment of the first instance court shall be raised to "Defendants and Appointors F".

Part 1 through 87 of the judgment of the first instance court shall be written with the "Evidences 1 through 7 of the first instance court" (including each number, if any).

2. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claims against the defendants and the designated parties F shall be dismissed in its entirety as it is without merit. Since the judgment of the court of first instance is consistent with this conclusion, the plaintiff's appeal against the defendants and the designated parties F shall be dismissed in its entirety.