1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The court's explanation concerning this case is the same as the statement of the judgment of the court of first instance except for the following parts written or added. As such, the court's explanation concerning this case shall be cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

【The part to be cited or added 【Defendant” in the second sentence 9 of the judgment of the court of first instance (the name was “C” but the name was changed to “B” on January 10, 2014).

"289,996,80 dollars" in the last sentence of the second judgment of the court of first instance shall be calculated as "289,996.80 dollars".

The "$ 462,721" in Part 9 shall be added to "$ 462,751" under the third page of the judgment of the first instance.

“The certificate of repayment of loan” between the 11th sentence and the 12th sentence under the third sentence of the judgment of the first instance shall be added to “(B)” next.

Each "B No. 22" of the last 16th and last 6th of the judgment of the first instance court shall be written with "B No. 22".

“The reasons why the contract is not prepared” in Part 5(20) of the first instance judgment shall be added to “(A evidence 7(1)).”

"E" shall be written in the 6th 20th 20th 20th 20th 20th 20th 20th 6th 1st 20th 20th 2nd 20th 6th 20th 6th 1st 7th 7th 7th 7th 1st 16th 16th 18th 7th 7th 200

The following shall be added to the fourth sentence of the first instance court:

3. On the other hand, the plaintiff asserts that the other party to the investment contract is not the E but the defendant, since the defendant actually controls D and E.

However, it is not sufficient to recognize that the written evidence Nos. 21 and 22 is practically controlled by the defendant, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Thus, the plaintiff's above assertion is without merit.

2. Accordingly, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed due to the lack of reason, and the judgment of the court of first instance is consistent with this conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.