logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2011.11.30 2011고단4999
신용정보의이용및보호에관한법률위반교사
Text

Defendant

A, B, C, and D shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for six months, and by a fine of KRW 3,00,000.

Defendant

E shall be subject to the said fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A shall enter K around January 16, 1995 and be in charge of the design management necessary for civil engineering works, and the collection and business of bid information.

Defendant

C was employed in K Construction around March 31, 2005, and from the end of December 2009, the Environmental Project Group and Environment Project Group and Vice-President were in charge of environmental construction design management, tender information collection.

Defendant

B became a member of K Construction around March 31, 2005, and from March 2, 2009, the Korea Civil and Environmental Project Headquarters has been in charge of the design management necessary for the bidding of civil engineering works and the collection of information on bidding.

Defendant

D operated entertainment establishments with “L”, and M and Defendant E worked as “L” employee.

1. On January 29, 2010, Defendant A and C, who participated in the tender by K construction around January 29, 2010, expressed the selection of the N Corporation Design Review Committee member, Defendant A and C, and the design review committee member, were willing to request the mutual interest centers to monitor the behavior of the Evaluation Committee member prior to the deliberation.

On January 29, 2010, the Defendants informed the Incheon Viewing P, Urban Railroad Construction Headquarters Q, R, public officials of Incheon Viewing service, work place, position, office, house address, cell phone number, etc. selected as design review committee members, and requested the surveillance of the players' behavior with the funds of eight million won.

Accordingly, D from January 30, 2010 to 06:00 on January 30, 201, together with M and E, as an employee of L.

2. From 10:00 to P, Q, R, S’s dwelling place, and place of work, detection of an individual’s privacy was conducted, including conducting criminal investigation.

Accordingly, the defendants' act of having D et al. detect the location of a specific person for business or investigating private life other than commercial transaction relationships such as financial transactions.

arrow