A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, the execution of the above sentence shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

When the Defendant was indicted with the Goyang-gu Seoul District Court for the case of assault, etc. that occurred in Goyang-gu E apartment, the Defendant was receiving a written application against the above apartment residents. However, the victim J, who is the above apartment residents, was aware that he obstructed this, and on April 20, 2016, the Defendant was called “J” to the victim on the phone around 18:53, 2016.

C. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. T. H. H. H. H. T. H. H. T. H. T

(a) p. J. D. C. C. C. C. C. C. C. H. H. H. shall be discarded;

A. Domestic Time

(p) Weighter B. L. L. L. L. L. L.W.

(p) Bath, dead, and discarded;

A. Domestic Time

(p) Scops without a spopper. When inside a ship, spoppers will be spoppers.

p. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma.

A. C. C. C. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H. H.D.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police to J;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on recording records, a recording of a currency list to take a photograph;

1. Relevant Article 283 of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense and Article 283 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Grounds for sentencing under Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. The scope of punishment by law: Imprisonment with prison labor for not more than three years;

2. Application of the sentencing criteria;

(a) Determination of types: Violence, intimidation, and one type (general intimidation);

B. There is no special sentencing factor:

(c) Scope of recommendations: two months to one year;

3. Determination of sentence: The defendant, who was tried for a period of four months of imprisonment and one year of suspended sentence, received a written application from a resident of the same apartment and received a written application from the same apartment, for the reason that the victim was obstructed by the victim, and even if again committed a crime during the trial, there is a question as to whether he/she is against his/her authenticity in committing a crime.

This is an unfavorable condition.

However, the defendant has no record of criminal punishment exceeding fine, the crime of this case was committed by telephone, and thereafter.