logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2015.12.11 2015고정767
사기등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Gambling;

A. On December 2, 2012, the Defendant, along with C, D, E, etc., used 52 Trump cards at the gambling place opened by G in Hasking-si, G in 402, which was established by G in Hasking-si, the Defendant: (a) held four cards per capita; (b) opened three times through which the card per capita was changed by 1 through 4; and (c) finally held the board money; and (d) in cases where the pattern of non-finite and number in Chapter 4 of the card which was finally possessed are different, a person with the lowest number who is the winner by comparing one another among those in which the largest number is the winner.

B. Around January 4, 2013, the Defendant, along with E, C, H, I, etc., visited the “bava” in the above-mentioned manner at the K Office located in the J of Guang-si, J.

C. On October 2013, the Defendant, along with L, M, N,O, etc., visited the “balone” in the P office located in the J of Hasking-si, Hahyeong-si.

2. Fraud;

A. On January 5, 2013, the Defendant received a remittance from the victim, stating that “The Defendant would lend KRW 1 million to Q Q, if he/she borrowed KRW 1 million, he/she did not intend to repay within 30 minutes even if he/she borrowed KRW 1 million.”

B. On January 5, 2013, the Defendant: (a) sent R and S in K office to the victim, who was found to the K office located in the Hah CityJ on January 5, 2013; and (b) made a false statement to the effect that “The Defendant would borrow money from R and S because it would receive money from R and S upon the completion of the inquiry.”

However, in fact, since the above Indian vehicle was the difference between the defendant's living woman, R and S were not the loaner, the defendant did not intend to borrow the loan from the victim by taking the loan as security.

As above, the Defendant, by deceiving the victim as above, obtained 1.8 million won from the victim in the same place and acquired it by deception.

Summary of Evidence

1. Part of the defendant;

arrow