logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원 2017.10.12 2016구합532
해임처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On March 1, 1989, the Plaintiff was appointed as a public educational official and served as an assistant principal of B elementary school located in the Chungcheongnam-gun, Chungcheongbuk-gun from March 1, 2015, and served as the assistant principal.

(1) From March 1, 2015, when working as an assistant principal of B elementary school from March 1, 2015, the reasons for disciplinary action (1) dealt with the affairs of school by 80 days (162 days) from the date on which he/she dealt with anti-Japanese sick leave, sick leave, sick leave, sick leave, sick leave, volunteer leave, outing, going out of school, etc.

(2) From June 2015, the first instance court did not process the status of work even during the first instance working hours and did so from outside.

(3) On July 27, 2015, the school leader worked at 12:40 without reporting or obtaining approval from the school leader on the work day during the summer vacation.

(4) On April 14, 2015, upon submitting an application for the school development research conference, the principal prepared the name of the principal and the private person in the recommended column without reporting it to the principal, and submitted the application.

(5) From April 15, 2015

4. By the 17th day of the Jeju-do school trip, it was inappropriate to act as a person responsible for the operation of the school tour, such as bringing the fluor cancer, which is an article prohibited from drinking or taking out of the country, into a student room.

(6) Improper language, such as taking teachers and staff and students’ desire, was used.

(7) A teacher and English instructor made an inappropriate statement about his gender once.

(8) A faculty member and an English instructor instructed unjust activities other than official duties.

(9) There was a difference in the number of roads in schools.

(10) On May 27, 2015 and November 6, 2015, the same school staff was injured, specially abused, or assaulted, and was held in a non-detained trial from the Cheongju District Prosecutors' Office on December 29, 2015.

B. On February 5, 2016, the Defendant issued a dismissal disposition against the Plaintiff on the ground that the Plaintiff violated Articles 56 (Duty of Fidelity) and 63 (Duty of Maintenance of Dignity) of the State Public Officials Act, as the grounds for the disciplinary action (hereinafter “instant disciplinary action”) set forth below (hereinafter “instant disciplinary action”).

C. The plaintiff is dissatisfied with the above disciplinary action.

arrow