Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for four months.

However, from the day this judgment became final and conclusive, the Defendants are above one year each.

Punishment of the crime

1. On May 1, 2017, at around 01:38, Defendant A was demanded to return home from a slope affiliated with the Dridge of the Ansan Police Station D, which was dispatched to the site after receiving a call at a place in front of the “private taxi terminal in front of the former 210”, and was taking a bath to the said taxi article C, and was under disturbance, such as taking a bath to the said taxi article C.

around that time, the Defendant moved the patrol car to the front of a private taxi terminal in front of the above part of the Defendant, while moving the patrol car to the front of the patrol car, she saw that “Isn't spare spare, Ispare spare spare spare spare spare spare in front of the slope E, spare spare spare spare spare sparespares, spare sparespares on the front of the slope E, and the spare spare spare spare sparespares by placing the spare

After the Defendant continued to stop the sloping, the Defendant committed an assault, such as the defect in order to close the door in the situation where he was on board the sloping, and the defect in order to open the door in his hand, the sloping of the sloping of the sloping of the sloping of the sloping of the sloping of the sloping of his hand, leaving the sloping of the sloping of his body, leaving the sloping of the sloping of the sloping of the Defendant, giving a warning to the Defendant, and interfering with the progress of the patrol by opening the sloping of the sloping of the sloping immediately.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties concerning the suppression and investigation of police officers' crimes.

2. The defendant B was found to have a defect in arresting A as a flagrant offender due to interference with official duties by F, who was dispatched to the scene with the date, time, place, and the above slope E at the scene with the foregoing slope E, and the defendant was found to have been working for arresting A as a flagrant offender.

followed. Does the arrest

The phrase "the front of the Inspector F" and the front of the Inspector F shall be prevented, and the background F shall be drawn in the future, and the past F's arms shall be left in the future.

This is about the arrest of a flagrant offender.