A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On August 9, 2016, the Defendant: (a) 00:20 on August 9, 2016, the Defendant: (b) reported the acquisition of lost goods in front of a restaurant located in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Gwangju; (c) reported that he embarked at the patrol team No. 231 to provide patrol service again after completing the receipt of lost goods; and (d) obstructed the front of the patrol; and (d) died within the dwarf; (d) Sheet, she was fright at the front of the patrol; and (e) she she was fright at the top of the steering box where she was seated, “I fright, frighth,” and “I am out of knick, I am knick at the front of the steering box,” and “I am out of the knife, I am knife and knife, I knife the Defendant’s knif.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with legitimate execution of duties of police officers.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement made by the prosecution with respect to E and F;

1. Night working place;

1. Application of Chapter IV Acts and subordinate statutes to suspect photographs;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act, the choice of criminal punishment, and the choice of imprisonment;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act, such as threatening a police officer who wears a uniform while performing official duties without any particular reason, is not good in light of the circumstances and methods of the instant crime, but it is not good to commit the crime. However, the fact that the Defendant is against the nature of the Defendant, and that the Defendant is only one fine for negligence.