Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine for negligence of KRW 3,000,000, and by a fine of KRW 1,000,000.

The above fine is imposed against the Defendants.

Punishment of the crime

1. On November 25, 2015, the Defendant: (a) at the E parking lot located in Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, the Defendant: (b) asked the Daegu-gu Police Station F District in G, who was called up upon receiving a report on 112, about the background leading up to the F District of the police station, as well as the background leading up to the slope H in the instant case; and (c) asked the reporter, “I am and us to find out the thickness.”

".........." The above H is a woman-friendly Gu, which is later established, so doing.

A) I expressed his desire to “I am aware of this weather,” “I am. I.”

Accordingly, if G and H were to file a complaint with the Defendant, and “A.”, the Defendant, by hand, committed assault on the chest part of the said G with her flaps and her flaps, and assaulted the chest part once by her flaps.

Then, the Defendant arrested a flagrant offender from H, but tried not to go against the patrol vehicle, and the circumstances leading up to the dispatch of the Defendant upon the request for support were asked by I to look at the Defendant’s fault, etc. in the patrol vehicle, and assaulted I’s retail in a way of tearing.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

2. Defendant B

A. At the time, at the time, at the place specified in the preceding paragraph, the Defendant: (a) arrested a flagrant offender of A and prevented him from opening the door in front of the defective patrol car in order to board the patrol vehicle; (b) shut down the door door opposite to H going back to the opposite direction; (c) H opened the door by opening the door again; and (d) assaulted several times with the defect that H attempted to board A by opening the door.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of police officers in relation to the prevention, suppression and investigation of crimes.

B. The Defendant damaged public goods at the time and place specified in the preceding paragraph, as above, frighting the police officer, and frighting from the above H.

It interferes with the execution of official duties.

I would like to hear the word ".........."