logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 2019.05.17 2018고단1787
도로교통법위반(무면허운전)등
Text

Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for each of the crimes referred to in subparagraphs 2018, 1787 and 2018, 3231, and each of the crimes referred to in subparagraph 2, 2018, 3304.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[criminal power] On January 19, 2017, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment for a violation of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) at the Changwon District Court on June 23, 2017, and the judgment became final and conclusive on September 6, 2017, and the judgment became final and conclusive on December 14, 2017, upon being sentenced to six months of imprisonment for the same crime, etc. in the same court on September 6, 2017, and the execution of the said punishment was completed on April 25, 2018.

【Criminal Facts】

"2018 Highest 1787"

1. The Defendant, on June 26, 2018, driven an E rocketing car without obtaining a driver’s license from around 3 16:40 on June 26, 2018, from the front day of the Kimhae-si D apartment parking lot to the front day of the Kimhae-dong in the same city.

2. The Defendant, on June 27, 2018, driven an Erocketing car without obtaining a driver’s license from around 8 km to around 12:40 on June 27, 2018, from the front day of the Kimhae-si to the front day of the same city in the same city.

Around 00:10 on September 25, 2018, the Defendant driven a car with approximately 18 km from the I Bank parking lot located in G in Kimhae-si to the above I Bank parking lot located in J of the same city via the residence of K in the same city, without obtaining a driver's license.

"2018 Highest 3304"

1. On March 10, 2016, the Defendant concluded that “N” in the “N” operation of the Victim B located in the Busan Sinan-gu M was false to the effect that “the Defendant would sell the horse to the victim by hanging the horse, but would pay the victim not later than October 30, 2016 if the Defendant borrowed KRW 5 million, the Defendant was liable for the debt worth KRW 7 million, while the Defendant did not have any particular property or income, but there was no intention or ability to pay the money on the agreed date, even if the Defendant borrowed money from the victim due to living expenses, etc.

The defendant deceivings the victim as such and belongs to it from the victim.

arrow