A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

[2016 Highest 980] Defendant did not have a certain occupation, and had a mind to steal an office with a rare distance from the body of people during the night hours, or a vehicle parked on the road.

On March 24, 2012, from around 11:00 to around 08:50 the following day, the Defendant opened and intruded the unauthorized window at the D office located in Bupyeong-gu, Seocheon-gu, Nowon-gu, Seoul, and then came out with the property equivalent to KRW 2,100,000,000,000, including one set of Nowon-gu, the total market price of the victim E-owned by the victim, one set of wire telephone, and one set of money per five hundred and sixty hundred thousand won. From around that time to March 16, 2016, the Defendant cut off the property equivalent to KRW 5,402,50,000, total market price over 111 times, as shown in the attached list of crimes.

[2015 Highest 3631]

1. On May 2015, 2015, the Defendant discovered that he was not equipped with a lock-up device for the H Tex vehicle owned by the victim G (26 tax) who was parked in the FF LD parking lot at Sinung-si, Sinung-si around 02:0, and found the victim’s Samsung 3 smartphone market value at KRW 900,000,000 for the galth 3 smartphone-phone market value owned by the victim and kept by the driver’s seat through the door of the opened vehicle.

2. On October 26, 2015, the Defendant was found to have not been equipped with locking devices for K Switzerland vehicles in the victim J (44 Doe) who was parked in the IFD parking lot at Sing-si, Sin City around 01:35 on October 26, 2015, and the Defendant did not discover the inside of the vehicle, such as contact sprink and grobbbbbbox, in order to steal the internal money, etc. by intrusioning the driver’s seat through the door of the vehicle opened, and did not realize that intent because it was impossible to discover the money for the purpose.

Summary of Evidence

[2016 Highest 980]

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement by the police concerning L;

1. Each statement of E, M, N,O, P, Q, R, S, T, and U;

1. Protocol of seizure (2015 high order 3631);

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of the respective laws and regulations of J and G;

1. Article 329 of the Criminal Act (the Do's point of view) and Article 342 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts.