logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2016.09.27 2015고단506
위증
Text

The defendant is innocent. The summary of this judgment shall be notified publicly.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged is the local fire-fighting officer affiliated with Boan Fire Station D.

On October 30, 2014, the Defendant appeared as a witness of the Daejeon District Court No. 1, 2014 High Court No. 877, which was located in the Dong-dong, Chungcheongnam-gu, Chungcheongnam-gu, Daejeon District Court’s Dacheon-gu, Daejeon, as a witness of the case violating the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents against E (hereinafter “instant lawsuit”).

During the hearing of the above case, the Defendant “A witness sent an accident to the said G during the first-aid vehicle sent by the said F and Defendant (E).”

“The question was made” and “C” from the above G.

I would like to ask the attorney's question that "at the time of arrival at the site, I would like to ask the driver who was a driver, who would be asked at the site, and would be asked once more during the transfer."

Then, “A witness shall be asked only to G;

It shall also be asked to any third person;

I also asked “G and Obaba to the employees of the lending company” for the question “.”

“The testimony of this case” (hereinafter “the content of this case”). However, in fact, the Defendant asked G to whether or not it is true whether or not it is true whether or not he/she asked G to the driver of Obane within the ambulances sent after F and E, and there was no fact that H, who is an employee of Obane lending business, asked for who is a driver of Obane.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

2. Determination

A. In a criminal trial, the conviction of guilt ought to be based on evidence with probative value sufficient to mislead a judge that the facts charged are true beyond a reasonable doubt. Therefore, if there is no such evidence, even if there is a suspicion of guilt against the defendant.

arrow