Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 700,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Criminal facts

On June 25, 2013, around 14:30 on June 25, 2013, the Defendant appeared and taken an oath as a witness of the injury case against Defendant C’s living together with the Suwon District Court No. 405 of the above court’s 2013 High Court Decision No. 405, Jun. 25, 2013.

During the above trial, the Defendant testified that “I am at risk,” the Defendant’s defense counsel’s “after that day, the witness returned from the Defendant to the witness father,” and “I am asked the Defendant whether there was a threat of D by the witness father to the effect that D was threateninging D to go to Ga,” and asked the Defendant at home, so we see whether there was a threat of D by the witness father.”

However, in fact, the defendant's testimony was false because he was about the following days after the defendant's husband and wife returned to C, and C was threatened to D, and he was asked to D about the day.

Accordingly, the defendant made a false statement contrary to his memory and raised perjury.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. A report on investigation (report attached to a written judgment);

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on trial records;

1. Relevant Article 152 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The crime of this case on the ground of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act is a case where the defendant appeared as a witness and testified in the court of the court of the court of the defendant, and there is a risk that the defendant's above act may interfere with the exercise of the State's judicial authority, and further, the defendant testified in an unfavorable circumstance, such as the nature of the crime is not good.