logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2015.11.03 2015고단3183
공무집행방해
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, the amount of KRW 100,000 shall be paid.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On September 11, 2015, at the front of Dongdaemun-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on September 01, 2015, the Defendant: (a) arrested a flagrant offender who was dispatched to the scene after receiving 112 report that “the Defendant assaulted a taxi engineer and a taxi engineer during a trial; (b) arrested a police officer D who belongs to the Seoul Eastdong Police Station C commander of the Seoul Eastdong Police Station, and attempted to carry him/her on the patrol, and (c) expressed that “I want to do so once I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am. I am am. I am am. I am. I am. I am am. I am. I am. I am am. I am. I am am am off, we am am at the right eye of the horse with a arms, etc., ambling

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties concerning police officers' 112 reports and arrest of flagrant offenders.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of each police statement of E and D;

1. Damage photographs;

1. Application of the legislation in its opinion;

1. Relevant Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of fines, and the choice of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The circumstances of the crime of this case that interfered with legitimate performance of official duties by assaulting a taxi engineer under the influence of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, and by using violence against a police officer dispatched after receiving a report from the above taxi engineer, etc. However, the circumstances of the crime of this case are not good. However, the defendant does not want punishment, and the obstruction of the execution of official duties seems to have occurred in the course of resistance against the defendant who attempted to take the defendant on a patrol vehicle under the influence of alcohol. Until now, the defendant is a primary offender who has no record of investigation or punishment, and is a youth who has lived and has lived with good faith and exemplary life, and the defendant is divided into the truth and is against the law.

The age, character and conduct, environment, and environment of the defendant.

arrow