logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.06.09 2014가합34893
부당이득금반환
Text

1. The defendant shall be the plaintiff.

(a) KRW 1,057,263,750 and interest rate of KRW 15% per annum from February 23, 2016 to the date of full payment.

Reasons

Basic Facts

On December 23, 1966, the Plaintiff registered the E 12-year-old F’s 173,755 square meters in B forest land (hereinafter “B forest”), C forest 21,419 square meters (hereinafter “C forest”), and D forest 407,935 square meters in the cadastral record at the time of filing the instant lawsuit on this case, the Plaintiff was registered as a clan established by making the FF’s 12-year-old fishing as a Si, and was changed to 407,935 square meters in the cadastral record on February 3, 2015.

(hereinafter referred to as “D forest”) has completed the registration of transfer of each co-ownership share on the grounds of the sale on December 22, 1966.

피고 산하 국방부는 1979. 7. 20.부터 B 임야, C 임야 전부를, 1985. 5. 1.부터 D 임야 중 별지 감정도 표시 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 121, 120, 119, 118, 117, 116, 115, 114, 113, 112, 111, 110, 109, 108, 107, 146, 145, 144, 143, 142, 141, 140, 139, 138, 91, 90, 89, 88, 87, 86, 85, 84, 83, 82, 81, 80, 79, 78, 106, 105, 104, 103, 102, 101, 100, 99, 98, 97, 96, 95, 42, 41, 40, 39, 38, 37, 50, 49, 48, 47, 46, 45, 93, 92, 147, 148, 149, 150, 151, 152, 153, 154, 155, 156, 157, 158, 75, 76, 77, 70의 각 점을 차례로 연결한 선내 부분 220,927㎡, 별지 감정도 표시 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 44, 43, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 100, 101, 102, 103, 104, 105, 106, 78의 각 점을 차례로 연결한 선내 부분 20,193㎡, 별지 감정도 표시 92, 91, 138, 137, 136, 135, 134, 133, 132, 131, 130, 129, 128, 127, 126, 125, 124, 158, 157, 156, 155, 154, 153, 152, 151, 150, 149, 148, 147, 92의 각 점을 차례로 연결한 선내 부분 3,143㎡(합계 244,263㎡, 이하 위 임야 전부를 ‘이 사건 임야’라 한다)를 현재까지 사격장 및 훈련장 등의 용도로 점유사용하고 있다.

[Ground of recognition] A without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5 (including each number), Eul evidence Nos. 3, 4, and 5, the result of the on-site verification by this court, the result of the appraisal entrustment to appraiser G by this court, the purport of the entire pleadings, and the plaintiff's claim for return of unjust enrichment.

arrow