logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.10.24 2016가합580888
공사대금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

(c) shall be deemed;

In this regard, the plaintiff does not raise any civil or criminal issue.

(Article 3(5) of the Special Agreement. (3) The first unit of this case, which was already sold, shall proceed to the construction of 470,000,000 won for the buyers in the future, and shall be completed after obtaining the second approval and permission for the fourth floor after the completion of the civil works.

(Article III(7) of the Special Agreement. (c)

1) On March 17, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a design and supervision contract with the Plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as “LArchitect”).

) On May 1, 2015, the design and supervision contract was concluded by dividing into the first (F 10 dong on land), the second (E 12 dong on land), and the third (2 dong neighborhood living facilities within the second). On May 1, 2015, the price for the first design and supervision contract was increased by agreement with L Architects, as follows: The content of each of the above design and supervision contract was as follows: The amount under a special contract (excluding value-added tax) for the first (24,00,000,000 won at the time of suspension of design service (excluding value-added tax) * 70%: 100,000,000 won at the 100,000,000,000 won at the 0,000,000,0000 won at the 20,000,005,000 won at the time of application for change of the building site (M 30,000,05,000

On May 29, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a sales contract for the sale of KRW 620,000,000 of the instant one unit to H, and used KRW 240,000,000 out of intermediate payment and the remainder of KRW 470,000 as the project cost of the instant case. (2) On June 9, 2015, the Plaintiff entered into a contract for the construction of a complex among the instant construction works with the Vietnam-N Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “VID”) for the construction cost of KRW 583,00,000,00 for the construction cost of the instant construction works, and on July 1, 2015, the Plaintiff paid KRW 240,000 for the intermediate payment and the remainder of KRW 470,000.

arrow