logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.10.17 2016나70040
계약금반환
Text

1. The part of the judgment of the court of first instance against the plaintiff, which orders payment below, shall be revoked.

The defendant.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On May 20, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a complex master plan, design and supervision contract (hereinafter “instant contract”) with the Defendant who operates the C architect office, relating to the “F new construction works” on the land D and E ground (hereinafter “F construction works”).

The main contents of the instant contract are as follows.

(2) Construction authorization and permission and basic design: 24 million won: the total amount of construction supervision: 12 million won: 50,000 won; 50% of value-added tax (service period) and 50%: 15 months: 0-month: 0-month-15 months: 10-month-10-month-15-month-2: 0-month-10-month-20, 000, 000 master plans and basic plans: 10-year-use plans and basic plans; 20-year-use plans and basic plans; 30-year-use plans and basic plans; 0-use plans and specifications; 10-year-use plans and specifications; 10-year-use plans and specifications; 20-year-use plans and specifications for buildings; 30-year-use plans and specifications; 10-year-use plans and specifications; 10-year-use plans and specifications; 40-use plans and specifications;

(2) Eul shall prepare three copies of the completed design documents with the office building truth or duplicate and submit them to Gap.

(3)

arrow