logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.10.20 2015가단109452
계약금반환
Text

1. As to the Plaintiff KRW 14,00,000 and KRW 10,000 among them, the Defendant shall pay to the Plaintiff KRW 4,00,000 from May 30, 2014, and KRW 4,00,00 among them.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On May 20, 2014, the Plaintiff entered into a complex master plan and supervision contract (hereinafter “instant contract”) with the Defendant who operates C architect office on May 20, 2014 regarding the construction work D and E ground F (hereinafter “SP”) on May 20, 2014, which is related to the instant case as follows.

1) Design and supervision contract amount) 1) master plans and basic plans - 20 million won: construction authorization and permission and principal plans - 24 million won - construction supervision - 12 million won per day: 0,000 won per day (excluding daily payment 56,000,000 won) and 2 (service period) master plans and basic plans: 2 months: 00 months in total: 15 months: 10 months; 60 months in total; 00 (Service 1) in total; 00; 1.60-year master plans and basic plans; 00-year working plans and basic plans; 00-year working plans and basic plans; 1.0-year working plans and specifications; 200-year working plans and specifications for buildings; 00-year working plans and specifications for construction (excluding civil works); 00-year working plans and specifications; 100-year work plans and specifications for intermediate payments; 100-year work plans and details of work permits;

(2) In case where B prepares three copies of completed design documents as a building truth or a copy and prepares three copies of the completed design documents as Gap (the plaintiff) under Article 9(2) of the Building Act.

shall be submitted to the Corporation.

(3) Design documents referred to in paragraph (2) shall be CD.

arrow