logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2017.02.14 2015가합61975
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant) is jointly and severally liable to the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff) for KRW 34,798,530 and its amount from March 11, 2016.

Reasons

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. Basic facts

A. The parties concerned are educational foundations operating E Hospital (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”); Plaintiff A is a person who, around August 13, 2014, received blood-oriented surgery (e.g., scopic expansion and scopic insertion; hereinafter “instant surgery”); and Plaintiff B and C are children of Plaintiff A.

B. 1) Since May 2014, Plaintiff A applied to the Defendant Hospital on July 2014, because there was symptoms from around two occasions, that spawn on the left hand and that spawn fall down, Plaintiff A applied to the Defendant Hospital on or around July 2014. 2) The medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital hospitalized the said Plaintiff in order to verify the cause of the said symptoms on or around July 24, 2014, and conducted a self-official image test (MRI), a self-official blood photographing method (MRA), and a cerebrovascular (TFCA), the result was confirmed that there was a suspicion that the two sides of the instant procedure and the right confectioning beer or closed, and that the blood or spawnosising view that the spawnosis might have been caused by the spawnosis infection and the cardiopulmonary spawnosisic disease.

Although the medical staff of the Defendant Hospital was planning to treat the above symptoms, the said Plaintiff discharged on July 29, 2014 due to personal circumstances.

3) On August 10, 2014, Plaintiff A re-hospitalized the Defendant Hospital and inspected detonating caps. As a result, it was confirmed on August 13, 2014 that the left-hand side of the serious brain beer and serious brain beer, and that the pipe of the Defendant Hospital would undergo the instant procedure for the treatment of the symptoms again on or around August 13, 2014. (4) On August 13, 2014, the medical staff of the Defendant Hospital anesthesia Plaintiff A, and then installed the 6French (hereinafter referred to as “F”), an incentive inserted to the said Plaintiff (hereinafter referred to as “F”), and installed a 690cm accelerator at the left-hand border beer, and the 2.5m x 9m x 9m m mpulphine was used to expand the spulecule type (e.).

5 The above medical professionals intend to be inserted in the following stages.

arrow