logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 목포지원 2018.08.24 2018고단440
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)
Text

Defendant

A shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for ten months and by imprisonment with prison labor for four months.

, however, from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants are the members of C, a violent organization, which is an organization of violence in a brea region.

On April 11, 2018, around 20:0, the Defendants calculated “F” entertainment points for the operation of the victim E (26 taxes) (hereinafter “the instant main point”). Defendant A, as the victim had talked with the victim, on the part of the victim, on the ground that the victim and talked about the part of the victim’s head were to answer the victim’s head with a bad attitude. Defendant B took the head of the victim’s face at around three times with the hand and drinking her hand, and Defendant B continued to move to the outside of the instant main point together with the victim, and Defendant A, as the victim and the victim were able to take part in the victim’s body while talked with the victim.

As a result, the Defendants jointly inflicted injury on the victim, such as external wounds on the left-hand side in need of approximately three weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. Each police statement made to E, I, and H;

1. A written diagnosis of the victim;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to on-site CCTV closure photographs and investigation reports (Attachment to personal cards of the C management ledger);

1. Article 2 (2) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act for the suspension of execution;

1. The defendants with reasons for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Code can be subject to criminal punishment for the same kind of crime, and this case is very poor since the defendants, who are the violent organization, unilaterally assaulted and inflicted bodily injury on the victim. However, the defendants led to confession of and reflect against the instant crime, and agreed with the victim.

arrow