The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Although it is inconsistent with the Defendant’s misunderstanding of facts to the police officers D, the lower court found the Defendant guilty of the instant charges by misunderstanding the facts, even though the Defendant did not assault D.

B. The lower court’s sentence of unreasonable sentencing (two years of suspended sentence for six months of imprisonment, two years of probation, and two hundred hours of community service order) is too unreasonable.

2. Determination

A. The lower court stated that “A police officer D” in an investigative agency and court of the lower court stated that “at the time of the instant case, the Defendant was physically pushed down with his body while taking care of his body and pushed down his chest two times with his hand from the defect that he was unable to regulate parking due to the movement of a motor vehicle reported by the Defendant at the time of the instant case.” The witness F, G, and E stated in the lower court that “the Defendant deemed that he was able to take a bath to D and pushed down,” and that “the Defendant was able to take a witness at the scene of the instant case at the time of the lower court’s appearance,” and that “A police officer was aware of the fact that the Defendant was frightened to the police officer at the time of the instant case’s appearance, and that he was frightd to the police officer at the time of the instant case’s appearance, and that the Defendant had consistently made a witness at the time and after considering the fact that the Defendant was frightd to the police officer at the time of the instant case.”