The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (in fact-finding) was that police officers who control a passenger car on board by the defendant at the time of the instant case were not victim D, and there was no assault by the defendant against the victim.

2. Determination

A. In light of the following circumstances acknowledged by the lower court and the evidence duly admitted and investigated by the lower court, the Defendant’s act of assaulting D by a police officer under drinking control is sufficiently recognized.

1) On April 10, 2014, the victim D, consistently from the investigative agency to the court of the court below, stated that “A vehicle was under influence on the road in front of the entrance down of the Government Station.” At the time, the victim D presented a so-called “d pertaining to drinking control on any ground.” The Defendant, who was on the front line, presented a so-called “d pertaining to drinking control,” and himself again presented a so-called “I am for a so-called driver because he is not a driver,” and the Defendant’s desire to take a so-called so-called so-called “I am for a so-called driver,” and the Defendant appeared to have a so-called a so-called d pertaining to a vehicle. After that, the Defendant made a statement from the vehicle to the driver’s seat, the Defendant was released from the driver’s seat to the driver’s seat, and the Defendant was also released from the driver’s seat to the driver’s seat of the vehicle in front of the victim’s seat and the driver’s seat.”

3. At the time of the instant case