beta
Text
1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On May 31, 201, Defendant BS purchased the Daegu Dong-gu CB site from Espool Lease Co., Ltd., Ltd., and completed the registration of ownership transfer on November 11, 201, and registered the said site divided into Daegu Dong-gu CB,CC, or CD on November 21, 201. On November 20, 2011, Defendant BS sold 2/4 of the CD equity interest to Defendant BY, Defendant BY, and BX, respectively, 1/2 of the CD equity interest, and Defendant BP on November 21, 201, the transfer registration was made to Defendant BP on November 21, 201, and 1/2 of the respective equity interest in CB and CE, and 1/2 of the CF equity interest to Defendant BV, Defendant BU, BV, BV, CG, and 1/3 of the respective equity interest, and each of the above land buyer sold to Defendant BP on November 21, 2015.
B. On November 22, 2011, Defendant CA Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd”) entered into a business management agreement with respect to Defendant Q andCC, with respect to Defendant BR, BV, BU, BT and CG, with respect to Defendant B and CH, with respect to Defendant B and CH, Defendant BS, BY, BY, and CE with respect to each of the above land for each of the following land (hereinafter “each of the instant commercial buildings”), the Defendant Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”) entered into a new business agreement with respect to each of the above land for each of the following land (hereinafter “each of the instant commercial buildings”). In relation to the establishment of business districts, project loans, project approval, business approval, etc., and the rest of the Defendants paid expenses of KRW 3.883 billion and fees of KRW 7760 million.
C. The remaining Defendants, other than Defendant Company, newly built two buildings of this case on their own land, and completed registration of the preservation of ownership of each of the instant commercial buildings as an aggregate building around March 2012.
On the other hand, the Defendant Company advertised the sale of each of the instant commercial buildings with the following contents, and the Plaintiffs reported the above advertisement, and the Plaintiffs sold each of the instant commercial buildings from November 25, 201 to March 31, 2012, and between the Defendant Company and the Defendant Company.