1. The plaintiffs' appeals against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

With respect to this case, this court's use is identical to the entry of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance except for the dismissal or addition of each corresponding part as follows. Thus, this Court cites it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Part 4 of the decision of the first instance court, "C" in Part 14 shall be changed to "C".

In the last 5th of the judgment of the first instance court, "a joint tortfeasor" is deemed "a joint tortfeasor (in the case of defendant C and D, a person who aids and abets the above illegal act intentionally or by negligence)".

Of the 6th sentence of the first instance court, the term “a witness or a witness in a criminal trial can only be recorded as his/her memory with his/her own experience, and does not have an obligation to make a statement consistent with objective facts (see, e.g., Supreme Court Decision 2004Da46366, Dec. 23, 2005).”

The "L" in Part 7 of the 7th judgment of the first instance court shall be referred to as "E".

Part 7 of the judgment of the first instance court, "B" in Part 12 of the judgment of the second instance is changed to "III".

According to the evidence Nos. 4 and 5 of the judgment of the court of first instance, “from the 7th instance court’s 16th to the 18th eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth eth e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e. e.).