1. The plaintiffs' appeals against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

1. The reasons why the court should explain this case are the same as the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, in addition to the dismissal of some of the judgment of the court of first instance as follows. Thus, it shall accept this as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Part 3, the crime of occupational negligence in Chapter 17 is regarded as "the crime of occupational negligence resulting in death".

In Part 3, the first branch office of the Chuncheon District Prosecutors' Office (No. 2015 type 4167) in Part 18 shall be deemed to be "the first branch office of the Chuncheon District Prosecutors' Office (No. 2015 type 4167)".

The 6th page 3 is referred to as “B” in the 6th page 3.

Nos. 7, 11, and 12 are as follows: “The accident was not between the time of the accident and the time of the accident,” and “M, which is the place of the accident, did not require prior permission to reflect the situation. At the time of the accident, the nearby temperature does not seem to be approximately KRW 3°C, and the ice light cannot be seen as a ice light.”

2. In conclusion, the plaintiffs' claims against the defendants should be dismissed on the ground that the plaintiff's claims are without merit. Since the court of first instance is justified in its conclusion, all appeals against the defendants are dismissed on the ground that they are without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.