logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2018.09.20 2016고단2601
사기
Text

Imprisonment with prison labor for the crimes No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 7 in the judgment of the defendant, for two years, and for the crimes No. 6, 8, and 9 in the judgment of the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

【Criminal Records of Crimes】 On December 17, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a suspended sentence of three years on December 25, 2014 by imprisonment with prison labor for fraud at the Suwon Giwon, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on December 25, 2014.

【Criminal facts】 [Attachment 2016 Highest 2601]

1. On June 22, 2011, the Defendant against the victim D’s fraud is entitled to operate the restaurant at the site of the public works in the G G works site of the G works site of the Gangseo-si, Kim Jong-si, which is scheduled to be executed by the F, in the mutual influent car page located in the Dong-si, Chungcheongnam-si, Ma-si, Ma-si (former names: E).

The phrase “the down payment of KRW 50 million was first changed.”

However, at the time, it is not clear whether F will construct the apartment building of the strong city that F was Kimpo, and since the defendant was not finally granted F the right to operate the restaurant by the person in charge of F, there was no intention or ability to grant the victim the right to operate the restaurant.

The defendant deceivings the victim as above, and he acquired the victim by delivery of five copies of the KRW 10 million check from the damaged party.

[2016 Highest 6135]

2. Since the “J” of the victim H Bill of Indictment appears to be a clerical error, it shall be corrected ex officio.

On July 14, 2008, the Defendant: (a) called, at the construction site of the Defendant’s management that is located in the area of the construction site of the Defendant’s management that is located in the Seoul-gu public interest area; and (b) at the restaurant, the Defendant: (c) stated that “The Defendant would transfer the right to manage the restaurant at the site of the new construction site of the apartment construction site of the Nam-gu I public interest at the port of port; and (d) in return, the Defendant would transfer the right to manage the restaurant at KRW 10

However, from March 1, 2008 to April 23, 2008, the Defendant was well aware of the fact that the said new apartment construction corporation did not run as a result of the said new apartment construction and that he was unable to run the restaurant at the construction site of the said new apartment.

Nevertheless, the defendant makes such a false statement, and he is on the job of the damaged person.

arrow