logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2018.07.18 2017고합358
특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(사기)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for two years.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

"2017 Gohap 358"

1. The Defendant, who violated the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Economic Crimes (Fraud against Victim B), has been working as the director of the Cheongdae CD division, committed as if he could intervene in this right because he has a friendly relationship with people such as emotional and legal circles, etc., and was willing to use the cafeteria operating right as the name of the Defendant’s personal debt repayment, etc.

On July 2012, the Defendant requested E to introduce “a person who is able to operate a restaurant”, and E requested the same purport to the audience house operated by him/her, and around that time, he/she was contacted by the victim B.

around August 2012, the Defendant was working in the Cheongdae Group C with the victim E located in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government around August 2012, and was able to intervene in various interest coupons due to their friendship with the genetics, and received the right to operate the restaurant at the G construction site.

50 million won shall be operated at the site of the construction site at the site of the State and part of the profits shall be paid.

“.......”

However, at the time of fact, there was no fact that the defendant had to receive money from the victim B, and there was no intention or ability to have the victim B operate the restaurant.

Nevertheless, the Defendant, as mentioned above, obtained a total of KRW 500 million from the remittance of KRW 70 million on October 2, 2012, KRW 30,000,000 from the victim B to the I Bank Account (Account NumberJ) in the name of the Defendant’s living together with the Defendant.

2. The criminal defendant against the victim E did not have to obtain the right to operate the restaurant from the F as described in paragraph 1, as described in paragraph 1, from September 2012, to the victim E, even though he did not have to obtain the right to operate the restaurant.

arrow