beta
Text
Defendant
A Imprisonment with prison labor for six months and for eight months, respectively.
However, this judgment is delivered to Defendant A.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Defendant
B From June 2014 to August 2015, 2015, G regional housing association-related apartment company H&A, an agent, was in office as the president of H&A, and the Defendants used it to receive money from victims I for the purpose of having the right to operate the restaurant.
Defendant
A around December 2014, by telephone, "B (Defendant B) is in charge of the president of the implementation company related to the construction of apartment houses of the G-N District Housing Association at present, and there is a restaurant at the construction site.
C. One time to see whether there is a thought
The defendants refer to "K" in the "K, the wife population J on December 28, 2014, and the defendants met the victim I and the defendant B constructed the victim's "a 1,170-generation partnership apartment with the F in terms of harmony" to the victim of "a 30 million won at the construction site of the above apartment."
On April 2015, 2015, it will be possible to operate a restaurant.
“Falsely speaking,” and Defendant A made a false statement for the same purpose.
However, in fact, Defendant B did not have any authority to operate the restaurant as the box of the apartment construction site. At that time, the construction work of the above apartment was not finalized and the construction-related permission was not acquired, and even if the Defendants received money from the injured party as the down payment for the restaurant operation right, they did not have the intent or ability to allow the injured party to operate the restaurant around April 2015.
On December 30, 2014, the Defendants conspired to induce the victim and received 25 million won in total from the Agricultural Cooperative Account under the name of the Defendant A and 50 million won in the face of KRW 100,000,000,000 from the victim, as the down payment for restaurant operation.
Summary of Evidence
1. Defendant A’s legal statement
1. The witness A’s legal statement (defendant B)
1. Legal statement of a witness I;
1. A deposit sheet of a bank;