logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2017.03.30 2016가합54243
손해배상(기)
Text

1. Defendant B and D jointly share KRW 3,000,000 with respect to the Plaintiff and the Plaintiff from June 14, 2016 to March 30, 2017.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The Plaintiff, including the party status, was a person who was released to the H election conducted by G (hereinafter “instant election”), as a candidate belonging to the “J Party” in the Incheon District, and the Defendant Company B (hereinafter “Defendant Company”) is a broadcasting business entity established for the purpose of broadcasting business and cultural service business. Defendant C is the head of the news report headquarters of the Defendant Company, and Defendant D is the reporter of the Defendant Company.

B. Plaintiff’s agreement and reversal on the candidate unification relating to the instant election

1. The candidates will be able to unify candidates for the I election districts through the competition lines of the public opinion poll.

2. This simplification shall be made at each candidate’s seat, and may not thereafter be reversed for any reason, such as the opposition of each candidate’s central or political party.

3. The candidates shall, in any case, return to their post on the result of the competition and immediately resign from their post.

4. The rules on competition of public opinion pollss shall be implemented in the same manner as the agreement on competition of public opinion pollss.

5. A press report should not be made until the NWW is completed.

1) The Plaintiff is the Plaintiff’s agreement on the unification of the right to vote (hereinafter “instant agreement”) regarding M and the instant election that had been released as a candidate for K’s election district as a candidate for K’s “L party” affiliated with K.

)를 하면서 다음과 같은 내용의 합의문을 작성하였다. 2) M는 O 오전경 국회 정론관에서 기자회견을 마치고 나오면서 당시 참석한 기자들에게 ‘원고와 M가 이 사건 합의를 하였고, 경선결과는 내일 저녁쯤 나온다’는 취지의 이야기를 하였다.

3) In the telephone public opinion poll that determines the candidate for the separation of right zones implemented pursuant to the N in this case’s agreement, M was determined as a candidate for the separation of right zones by obtaining support from M 57.4% and the Plaintiff 42.6%. M published the result of the competition in P 00:30, and the result of the competition was reported through each media company in P 20:0,000.

arrow