logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2014.12.19 2014고합742
공직선거법위반
Text

Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the Defendants is publicly announced.

Reasons

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is a person running a public opinion poll company called "K" in the Daegu-dong-guJ, and Defendant B is the head of the public opinion poll office of M who released him as a candidate for his election, which was implemented on June 4, 2014.

No one shall, when conducting a public opinion poll on an election, ask questions to a specific political party or candidate using words or sentences to make them biased, and conduct an election campaign using letters, telegrams, facsimile and other means of telecommunication to the elector in a way that is not prescribed in the Public Official Election Act during the election period.

Nevertheless, in order to raise awareness of the above M and to inform the electors of the fact as a single candidate for the above M, the Defendants organized a question on May 31, 2014 and recruited to conduct a public opinion poll.

Accordingly, Defendant A conducted a public opinion poll on June 1, 2014 to 15:27, using the ARS RD method, which was specially adjusted from the house of Defendant A located in the Cheongdo-gun N in the Cheongdo-gun-gun-do-si, and called “this case public opinion poll” (hereinafter referred to as “instant public opinion poll”) by phoneing to 403 persons from the Busan elector.

6. In the 4 local elections, L elections were adopted as two candidates for the unification to which they belong.

The following candidates who support the two candidates are ① No. 4 M, which is affiliated with the camping right candidate, ② No. 1 Pparty sign 2, Q3 is not a candidate to support.

‘The content of the election campaign' was made by making inquiries about the above M using biased words to the above M, and making election campaign by publicizing that M was a single candidate for the right of camping.

As a result, the defendants conspired to conduct a public opinion poll on L election and ask questions by using words to which they belong M in the election period, and at the same time, they are not prescribed in the Public Official Election Act during the election period.

arrow