logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.12.13 2015가단239198
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The Defendants’ respective Plaintiff KRW 20,000,000 per annum from November 5, 2015 to December 13, 2017.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. On October 10, 2014, the Plaintiff was determined as A from D University Hospital (including E Hospital; hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) operated by Defendant B (hereinafter “Defendant B”), and was solicited by Defendant C, the principal physician of Defendant hospital, around that time.

B. On October 17, 2014, the Plaintiff received from Defendant C a sprinke surgery from Defendant C to treat the sprinke cancer (hereinafter “instant surgery”). On October 24, 2014, the Plaintiff discharged the instant surgery from Defendant C.

C. After the instant surgery, the Plaintiff’s surgery division, etc. Blshe and the Plaintiff’s surgery took place. Accordingly, the Defendant hospital’s smoking procedure was conducted several times until November 21, 2014, and the result of the Defendant hospital’s early high-frequency marketing test conducted on July 3, 2015 is that “it is likely that the Plaintiff has a liquid storage in the part of the national station, which is measured at a distance of at least 5 cm on the inner wall of the base, and this is likely to be a long-distance liquid type after the surgery.” The result of the early high-frequency reading of around September 9, 2015 conducted on September 9, 2015, “5.4 x 5.4 cm on the upper part of the upper part wall, or chronic fluid storage is observed.”

From December 1, 2015 to August 2, 2016, the Plaintiff was given medical treatment to the left-hand neck, shoulder, liquid part, etc. in the imposition of the Defendant Hospital over several times, and gave rise to some symptoms. However, even up until the physical examination of the instant case, the Plaintiff complained of the symptoms leading to the left-hand neck and the left-hand neck and shoulder. From the time of the physical examination of the instant case, it is difficult for the Plaintiff to go up with the left-hand neck and shoulder. The Plaintiff complained of the symptoms leading up to the right-hand flab and the back exhibition.

However, there was no evidence of damage to the path, and it is difficult to conclude whether the symptoms of the symptoms around the left-hand neck are being treated currently, and there is no post-treatment that can be judged due to medical problems, and in relation to disability.

arrow