1. The judgment of the first instance, including the Plaintiff’s claim expanded by this court, is modified as follows.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, which cited the instant case, is the same as the ground of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the dismissal or addition as set forth in the following paragraph (2). Therefore, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of Article 42

2. Part V of the judgment of the court of first instance, which is written or added, has been written by adding "Nos. 1 through 5, 7, 8" to "Nos. 1 through 5, 7, 8, 10".

The following shall be added to the 3rd page of the first instance judgment.

In particular, if the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital found that the left-hand petal disorder was damaged in the course of the instant surgery while stuffing the Plaintiff’s upper-hand ray, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital must pay attention to the fact that the remaining right-hand petal disorder may have been damaged in the event that the Plaintiff’s operation history and the size of the Gap ray are damaged to the right-hand bale, etc., and that the risk of pulmonary bal gyeal damage is higher in light of the Plaintiff’s surgery and the size of the Gap gye, etc., and that the Plaintiff’s upper-hand gye is not revealed to be bad, the medical personnel of the Defendant Hospital should carefully determine whether there is a need to remove the entire right-hand gye system other than the upper-hand gye system of the removed upper-hand gye, and even more care should have been paid to the right-hand gyegal gye in the first instance judgment.

The medical team of the Defendant hospital is reasonable to view that the medical team of both sides of the instant case caused damage to both sides of the first instance judgment while completely conditioning both sides of the first instance judgment without any serious review and effort to minimize the scope of the first upper judgment or minimize damage to the second instance judgment at the time of the instant surgery. “The Plaintiff,” in the first instance judgment No. 9, “The possibility, side effects, etc. of the Plaintiff’s symptoms of the first instance judgment.”