logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.07.16 2018가합531590
손해배상(의)
Text

1. The Defendants jointly and severally against the Plaintiff A, KRW 870,384,162, Plaintiff B, and C, respectively, and each of the said amounts.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The parties 1) Defendant D is G Hospital located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).

(2) The plaintiff is a medical specialist operating the outside department, and the defendant E is a medical specialist operating the anesthesia of the defendant hospital. (3) The plaintiff is a person who was performed a sacrine surgery from the defendant E and the chief physician of the anesthesia at the defendant hospital, and the plaintiff B is the father of the plaintiff, and the plaintiff C is the mother of the plaintiff Eul.

B. Plaintiff A’s head of the Defendant Hospital: (a) was born on the H date; (b) was discovered in the left-hand post of the Plaintiff’s child and the scheduled medical examination; and (c) was admitted to the Defendant Hospital on July 17, 2015 after the birth of the Plaintiff, and around 46 days after the birth of the Plaintiff, the Defendant Hospital was admitted to the Defendant Hospital. As a result of the early high-frequency test on the part of the Plaintiff’s left-hand post, it was confirmed that the head and the stop were protruding on the left-hand post of the Plaintiff; and (b) it was confirmed in the right-hand post at the right-hand post that the physical storage, which appears to be an escape, was confirmed and suspected of escape. (c) Plaintiff A was hospitalized to the Defendant Hospital on July 22, 2015, around 51 days after birth.

(3) The Plaintiff measured the body temperature (36.3 cc.) at the time of hospitalization, but moved to the operating room at around 08:45 without undergoing a son X-ray photograph and blood test, which is an examiner before the operation. Although the medical personnel of the Defendant hospital did not secure Plaintiff A’s beer before anesthesia, Defendant E was in short of operating hours and was planned to inhale anesthesia by using mack, and started the operation without undergoing an examination before and after the operation. 4) The anesthesia for the instant operation was commenced on around 08:46, and completed around 09:5, and the 10:50 p.m. was used before the operation, and the 15:50 p.m. operation was completed before the completion of the operation.

arrow