logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 2014.06.13 2013고합532
마약류관리에관한법률위반(대마)
Text

Defendant

A, C, and D shall be punished by imprisonment for one year, by imprisonment for eight months, and by imprisonment for one year and six months, respectively.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A and B enter universities in the United States, who are in leave of absence, are pro-Japaneses, and Defendant C is one of the public interest service personnel working in K in Gangnam-gu Seoul, and Defendant D is one of the parties with no certain occupation, and Defendant E is one of the parties with the United States of America as Defendant C and the latter.

Defendants shall not trade marijuana or smoke marijuana, because they are not authorized to handle narcotics.

1. Defendants A and B’s co-principal (mariju smoking) stated in the indictment that, around April 2013, at the workroom of Defendant A located in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Building No. 1913, Defendant A deducted tobacco tobacco tobacco plant, put them into the marith amount brought by Defendant B in, and put them in the indictment that Defendant B would turn out, and put them into the indictment that they would turn out. However, according to the records of this case, Defendant A and B appear to have smoked marijuana by means of manufacturing a pipe for smoking in the way of gambling, other than these methods, and thus, it is recognized as above.

As a result, marijuana was smoked.

From that time until May of the same year, the Defendants smoked marijuana over five occasions in the same manner at the same place.

2. Defendant A, C, and D’s joint criminal conduct (Smoking) together with the Defendants, around October 24 of the same year, after deducting the beginning of the market price from the rooftop of the building where there is a work room of 120 E of the Seocho-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government M& building 120, Defendant A, and D indicated in the indictment as “Defendant D,” but this appears to be a clerical error in the “Defendant A and D,” and thus, it should be recognized as above.

Pursuant to paragraph (1) of this Article, approximately 0.3g of the hemp purchased, as described in paragraph (1) of this Article, shall be put in approximately 0.3g of the hemp, and three others shall be attached with a fire to smoke by smoking.

3. The defendants A and C's co-principal conduct (mariju smoking) together with the defendants

9. Middleman Seoul.

arrow