The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (e.g., imprisonment with prison labor for not less than two years, 40 hours of sexual assault therapy, and Confiscation) of the lower court is too unreasonable;

2. Determination

A. It is recognized that the Defendant led to confession and reflects the instant crime, did not have the same criminal record, and agreed with the victim.

B. However, in full view of the following circumstances: (a) although the Defendant was in a position of care for the management of the inspection, not only had sexual intercourses with the inspection, but also had the face-to-face shooting of the inspection, and the nature of the crime is not very good; (b) was planned to install CCTV to take the face-to-face shooting (see, e.g., Article 334 of the Investigation Record); (c) the frequency of taking the face-to-face shooting shootings up to 29 times; and (d) other circumstances, which are the conditions for the sentencing specified in the argument of the instant case, including the Defendant’s age, details of the crime, and circumstances after the crime, even if considering the above conditions favorable to the Defendant, the lower court’s sentence is too

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.