1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The reasoning of the court's explanation of this case is the same as the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, it is cited by the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

[Plaintiffs are the same as that of the temple affiliated with Defendant Order (the first date for pleading of the trial). Even if the temple did not comply with the constitution of the Order to which Plaintiff Order was affiliated, and its faith and care were combined, and the inspection was removed from the Order to which it was affiliated, this is merely that it was done by an individual to withdraw from the Order to which he belongs, and it does not result in an alteration of the Order to which he had already been established as the subject to the independent rights and obligations, and as long as the inspection was established, the division of the temple itself is not acknowledged (Supreme Court Decision 9Da6983 delivered on May 12, 200). Even if newdo and deceasedman who had been affiliated with Defendant Order to escape from the Order to the Order to which Plaintiff Order was originally affiliated, it cannot be deemed that Plaintiff Order to be changed from the Order to which Plaintiff Order belongs or divided from Defendant, and it cannot be deemed that Plaintiff Order to have been issued as 14th of Busan High Court.

Supreme Court Decision 2015Ma90). 2. Conclusion, the plaintiff's lawsuit in this case is unlawful and dismissed, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just in this conclusion, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit.