beta
Text
The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The summary of the grounds for appeal (misunderstanding of facts and improper sentencing) stated to the effect that the Defendant explicitly withdraws his/her argument of mental and physical weakness, excluding mistake of facts and unfair sentencing, on the first trial date of the trial of the first instance. However, the Defendant stated to the effect that taking into account the sentencing
A. While under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant, while taking advantage of the breath, took advantage of the brupted vehicle and booming the Defendant, expressed a bruptly booming the Defendant. However, there is no plucking or plucking of E’s fingers.
B. The punishment of the lower court (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.
2. Determination
A. The judgment of the court below and the court of first instance as to the assertion of facts revealed by the evidence duly adopted and investigated by the court below, i.e., the CCTV images inside the instant ambulances, i.e., ① it is confirmed that the shoulderer Defendant was aware of the Defendant by shaking the Defendant’s left side and right shoulder of fire officials E, who are members of the first-aid vehicle, and the Defendant was aware of the fact that E was carried out by cutting the Defendant’s left side and cutting back again, and it is confirmed that the Defendant was frightly and strongly fright the Defendant’s left hand, and ② at that time, the Defendant was frighted to E while taking a desire to “Ig fright fright, dead fright down,” and the Defendant did not fright up the Defendant’s left hand with two descendants outside the country to control the Defendant, ③ the Defendant did not fright the Defendant’s desire to fright his own hand.
However, in the above CCTV images, in addition to the shoulder of the Defendant’s shoulder, the appearance of E to catch the Defendant’s ear is not verified at all, and ④ Even after E knife and pressures the Defendant’s two descendants, the Defendant’s knife off the clothes of fire fighters and fire fighting officers, including E.
In full view of the fact that the Defendant continued to take advantage of the fact that it was stated in the facts charged.