1. Defendant A is not guilty. 2. Defendant B is dismissed, respectively.

3. The summary of the judgment against Defendant A.

1. The part concerning violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) against D;

A. At around 01:10 on July 9, 2013, the Defendants of the facts charged: (a) on the ground that Defendant A, who was assaulted from the G cafeteria of the F operation in Seo-gu Daejeon, tried to oppose it, Defendant D (the age of 40) who is an employee at the above cafeteria, was plicked by the said cafeteria; (b) Defendant B, while taking a bath, she jointly d's arms and arms at the time when Defendant B took a part of D's arms, and jointly d's 14-day treatment for approximately 14 days.

B. First of all, we examine whether A was plucking or plucking up D’s fingers.

In this regard, the witness D was about to go to the right hand of the chair in the first investigative agency when he tried to go to the chair, and was called the man's hand to get off the chair, and that the man caused the left hand hand of the seat in the court.

On August 16, 2013, the investigative agency stated that "A was 25 pages," and on August 16, 2013, "A was placed in the process of leaving his/her arms to get off his/her will, and "A was intending to get off his/her arms to the right hand," and "A was plicking the second second hand of his/her left hand."

The “A” stated in this Court as a witness, and the Defendant was present at this Court as a witness, “A was able to write son and knife A’s hand as knife and knife A’s hand, and knife A was knife and knife A’s hand, so knife and plicked.

‘At the time of making a statement to the effect that ‘' is made, ‘Do' makes a statement to the police, and ‘Do' makes the sale of A and restrain it.

It was plicked and plicked in the process that kikis A, more than A, enter the arms.

I do not think that A intended to commit an intentional assault.

. investigation records;