1. The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to the Plaintiff for KRW 33,508,230 and KRW 17,548,383 from December 14, 2001 to October 5, 2006.

1. The description of the grounds for the claim shall be as specified in the attached Form;

(A) The term “Defendant D” appears to be a clerical error in the name of “Defendant A”.

A. Article 150(1)(a) of the Civil Procedure Act (hereinafter “Defendant A”) provides a written reply demanding the dismissal of the Defendant’s request under the name of E, while E is the representative director of Defendant A, this appears to have been submitted by the misunderstanding that E is an individual of E who is not a stock company A, and the seal affixed to the written reply is based on the seal of E, which is not the corporate seal of Defendant A, but the seal affixed to the written reply. The contents of the written reply are merely the content that E was exempted from liability, and it is not related to Defendant A, and E is not a content of the written reply. Thus, Defendant A is deemed to have been led to the attendance

B. Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act and Article 150(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act against Defendant 2

B. Judgment by publication (defendant 3) Article 208(3)3 of the Civil Procedure Act