logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 청주지방법원영동지원 2019.12.18 2019가합63
유치권부존재확인
Text

1. It is confirmed that the Defendants’ lien does not exist with respect to each real estate listed in the separate sheet.

2...

Reasons

1. The description of the grounds for the claim shall be as specified in the attached Form;

2. Applicable provisions;

(a) Defendant B and Defendant D: Articles 208(3)2 and 150(1) (a) of the Civil Procedure Act (a judgment based on the deeming that the case is one);

B. Defendant C: Articles 208(3)2, 150(3), and 150(1) of the Civil Procedure Act (a) (a) of the Civil Procedure Act provides only a formal reply demanding dismissal of claim without stating the substantive reasons disputing the Plaintiff’s claim even though the Plaintiff was served with a duplicate of the instant complaint. On the first date for pleading, a subagent of lawsuit appeared at the court and did not state any substantial reasons other than seeking dismissal of claim, and thus, the Plaintiff’s assertion is deemed to have led to the confession of all of the Plaintiff’s assertion).

arrow