1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. The plaintiff's assertion has a claim for the construction price in the Pungyang industry.

On July 7, 2014, the Defendant promised to pay the Plaintiff the obligation of the Pungs Industry up to August 10, 2014.

Therefore, the defendant should pay 30 million won and damages for delay to the plaintiff.

2. The written evidence No. 1 of the judgment alone is insufficient to recognize that the Defendant promised to repay the obligation to the Plaintiff, and there is no evidence to deem otherwise that the Defendant promised to repay the obligation to the Plaintiff as an individual qualification.

Rather, according to the statement in Gap evidence No. 1, although it is recognized that the defendant prepared a written agreement as alleged by the plaintiff, it is only recognized that the status of C representative director D (the name before the name of the defendant is the name of the defendant) is specified in C representative director D (the name of the defendant before the name of the name of the defendant). Thus, it cannot be viewed that

3. Conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit.