Defendant shall be punished by a fine of five million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

On October 30, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment for two years and four months with prison labor for fabrication of private documents at the original branch of the Chuncheon District Court, and the judgment became final and conclusive around that time.

Although this part of the indictment was omitted in the indictment, if the applicable provisions of the indictment contain the provisions of Articles 37 and 39(1) of the Criminal Act, it seems that this part of the final judgment was omitted by simple mistake.

Therefore, it is stated in the criminal facts without going through the amendment of indictment.

Around 2011, the Defendant, who operated a “C” mobile phone agent in the Seocho-si B, opened a mobile phone without permission using a copy of another’s identification card secured in the course of operating the said agency, and received the subsidy, and disposed of the mobile phone and used it for living expenses, etc.

1. D-related crimes;

A. A. Around October 26, 2011, the Defendant forged private documents (1) indicated “D”, “E”, and “E” in the customer’s name column of the site for application for membership of a mobile phone which was kept in the aforementioned “C” mobile phone agency using a verification color pen, and signed D’s signature in the confirmation column.

As a result, the defendant has forged two copies of a mobile phone subscription application in the name of D, which is a private document related to rights and obligations for the purpose of uttering.

(2) On November 29, 2011, the Defendant: (a) indicated “D”, “E”, and “F at the beginning of the class in the customer address column” in the customer name column of the site for the application for mobile phone entrance which was kept in the said “C” mobile phone agent using a testing pen; and (b) signed D’s signature in the confirmation column.

Accordingly, for the purpose of uttering, the Defendant forged a written application for joining a mobile phone in the name of D, a private document related to rights and obligations.

B. Around October 26, 2011, the Defendant is a mobile phone with the aforementioned “C” mobile phone agent.