beta
Text
1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, the part against the defendant exceeding the following amount ordered to be paid shall be revoked.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. 1) A Co., Ltd. purchased a factory listed in the separate sheet 1 in the real estate compulsory auction procedure and completed the registration of ownership transfer with respect to the said factory on October 17, 2008. 2) On June 28, 2012, the Defendant was operating a laundry factory with the trade name “F” from C from June 28, 2012 to June 3, 200,000 to June 3, 200,000, and from July 1, 2012 to June 30, 2017, respectively, from July 1 to June 30, 2012.
3) Regarding the above factories and the attached list 2 located within the above factories, C entered into each insurance contract with the Plaintiff and the Defendant with Hyundai Marine Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. as follows. The major contents of each of the above insurance contracts are summarized as follows: The insurer’s insurance contract number 16:00-00-9 September 10, 2019, contract number 16:00-00- July 18, 2018 to July 18, 2018, and the amount of the insurance contract of Gwangju Northernbuk-gu D (building 50,000,000,000 won for dividends, fire insurance without dividends, fire insurance (Hi1304) for the types of Hyundai Marine Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. (Hi1304): 0,000 won for the contract number : 00-16:00-200-300- won for the goods insured under the Defendant’s insurance contract: 00-300- won for the goods insured
B. The Co-Defendant A was indicted for committing a crime of causing fire to the above factory and was sentenced to three years of imprisonment by the court of first instance (Seoul District Court 2015Gohap434) on January 15, 2016. While both A and the prosecutor appealed, the appellate court (Seoul High Court 2016No24) rendered a judgment dismissing the appeal on August 18, 2016, and the said judgment became final and conclusive as it was not filed by both A and the prosecutor.
However, in the appellate court, the prosecutor filed a request for medical treatment and custody with A (2016 U.S. High Court).